Compare firms
Rankings / Eternity Law International
07 Band 3

Eternity Law International

Prague, Czech Republic · Founded 2014 · 20-30 team
CLBR index score
63/100

Founders who want one CEE firm for a crypto licence alongside parallel forex, banking or corporate work.

Score breakdown · CLBR v1.0

Seven pillars, one score.

Licensing specialisation 13/22

Multi-vertical practice spanning crypto, forex, banking, corporate and tax. Crypto is a meaningful department rather than the exclusive focus, so the specialisation signal is diluted and the pillar sits in the low-teens despite the crypto team being real.

Jurisdictional coverage 12/18

Eight EU regimes and five non-EU markets documented, with strong CEE depth led by the Czech Republic. A wide, credible footprint that lands mid-pillar — broad on CEE, lighter on Western EU.

Licences secured 9/15

Established since 2014, with crypto-vertical volume estimated at 30-50 filings from case-study materials. Framed under licences secured, the count reflects a long operating history rather than a published grant tally.

AML / DORA depth 6/13

Some partners hold prior regulatory or financial-supervisory roles, but this is less prominent in the firm's marketing than at the specialist boutiques. Read as AML/DORA and ex-regulator depth, the bench is present but understated — the firm's weakest pillar.

Transparency 7/12

Service pages carry indicative pricing, and testimonials are present but not LinkedIn-verified. Methodology is not publicly described, so this lands mid-pillar — more disclosure than the quote-only firms, less than the fully published leaders.

Post-licence support 9/10

Lifecycle is strong on the corporate-administrative side, with an in-house banking arrangement rather than a referral. Tokenisation and DORA-specific work run lighter than the specialist leaders, but the ongoing-compliance stack is deep.

E-E-A-T 7/10

Named team page with full bios, plus conference engagement and published commentary that skews to tax and corporate rather than crypto. Authority is real but trails firms with a stronger crypto-specific publication record.

Where Eternity Law scores highest

Eternity Law scores highest on CEE coverage and its bundled multi-vertical stack. Operating since 2014, it holds established local-regulator relationships led by the Czech National Bank, which under MiCA has taken over crypto-asset supervision and is working through application backlogs.

The bundle is the practical draw. Eight EU regimes and five non-EU markets are documented, and the in-house banking arrangement means a founder running parallel forex or banking-adjacent work does not have to add a separate provider for it.

Where Eternity Law is weaker

The soft spots are specialisation dilution and the depth signals behind it. Crypto licensing sits inside a five-vertical practice that also handles forex, banking, corporate and tax, so the pure-crypto focus reads thinner than at a dedicated boutique.

Two pillars carry the weight of that. Ex-regulator and AML/DORA credentials are present — but understated in the firm’s marketing — and the published commentary leans to tax and corporate rather than crypto. For a pure MiCA CASP file that turns on supervisor-side insight, the specialist leaders score better on both.

Eternity Law by jurisdiction

The Czech Republic is the core: the Prague team files CASP authorisations with the CNB and leads the firm’s CEE coverage from there. In Lithuania it handles MiCA CASP applications with the Bank of Lithuania as part of its central-European set, and in Poland it covers CASP work with the KNF for CEE-facing crypto businesses.

Reviewed by Editorial team · Last updated 2026-07-14 · Scored on the CLBR rubric. Placement is editorial and never sold — see disclosure.